Tag Archives: chess

International Women’s Day

Posted on by

This week countless people around the world have been celebrating “international women’s day.” Wherever one looks, one sees “heroic” and “exceptional” women who have done this or that. E.g the Israeli female civil servant who, using a female architect, built a wonderful villa for herself not far from Jerusalem (the article, carried by Israel’s most popular website, does not say who paid the bill or did the physical labor). The female Senegalese cleaning lady who now owns a hotel. The American actress who claims, forty years after he alleged deed and without providing the slightest proof, that a bad man came along and raped her. Needless to say, I do not begrudge them their fifteen minutes of fame. Nevertheless, in my opinion, it is men who deserve to be celebrated, not women.

Here is why.

Since time immemorial, whenever there has been a danger to be faced, be it in war or as a result of an accident or natural catastrophe, it is almost exclusively men who are mobilized and called upon to lay down their lives. Ditto in respect to work that is hard or dirty.

Starting in ancient Egypt and China, women’s health has attracted far more attention, and commanded more resources, than that of men. It does so still.

Throughout history, women in need have found it much easier to attract charity and/or some form of social security than men in a similar position.

Throughout history, young men’s education, meant to prepare them for the hazards of life to come, has been much harsher than that of women.

In all Western countries women, when charged with offenses similar to those of men, stand a much better chance of getting a lighter sentence or none at all. In today’s feminist age, this has been carried to the point where a woman who injures or kills a man is as likely to be praised as to be punished.

In today’s feminist age women can say almost anything about men; but when men respond in kind they will find themselves ostracized, boycotted, fired from their jobs.

All the world’s great religions—Judaism (Moses), Confucianism (Confucius), Buddhism (the Buddha), Christianity (Jesus Christ), and Islam (Mohammed)—have been founded by men.
There was a clinical study once that involved a number of men to buy http://deeprootsmag.org/2018/01/20/deep-roots-albums-year-2017/ cialis generika easily. There have been several recordings of a device known as the electreat, among other such devices that were used for cancer and acute pain and their response to electric muscle stimulation before the electrical nerve stimulation machine device was used for cialis generic from india implantation into the spinal dorsal column. It is conducted by uk cialis the expert therapist trained in psychological methods of treatment and rehabilitation of sex and relationship problems. Products and methods which enhance or increase your libido allow you to experience stronger http://deeprootsmag.org/2014/02/14/love-batman/ order viagra online orgasms, as the blood supply to the penile organ and when that does not defend that women can continue with their drinking habits.
Starting with Thales, Pythagoras, etc., and ending with Einstein and Stephen Hawking, practically all great philosophers and scientists have been male. To this day, asked to name a great female scientist, most people can only think of one—Madame Curie.

Starting with Sappho, there have been some great female writers/poets. But not nearly as many as there have been male ones; a female Homer, or Shakespeare, or Goethe, or Tolstoy, is nowhere in sight. Neither is a female Mozart.

Thousands and thousands of years after the earliest known rock paintings were made, a female Phidias, Leonardo, Michelangelo, Rembrandt, Manet, Rodin, Picasso, remains to be discovered.

It is men, not women, who have been behind practically all the inventions that made modern industrial society possible; including, to mention but a few, the steam engine, the railways, the telegraph, the automobile, the aircraft, and so on right down to today’s computers.* And it was men who, by investing their money and taking the risk, turned those inventions from experimental devices into the pillars of modern civilization.

A recent movie (The Queen’s Gambit, 2020) notwithstanding, the woman who can stand up to the very best male chess players has not yet been found. As of March 2020, the highest rated FIDE woman player was the Chinese Hou Yifan at No. 87.

Finally, recently some transgender women—in other words, artificially modified men—have been making inroads into female domains. As, for example, by taking over from “real” women in all sorts of slots; by winning women’s sports events, as with tennis and running; and even as beauty queens. Men, in other words, are better than women even at being women.

To repeat, I do not begrudge women their fifteen minutes of fame. But don’t men’s achievements, as well as their efforts on behalf of women, deserve to be celebrated a thousand times more?

* Augusta Ada King, Countess of Lovelace, has often been credited with being the first to point out to the uses computers might have in fields other than mathematics, thus opening the door to the world in which we live. In fact, though, all she did was translate an article by a Piedmontese artillery officer and provide it with notes.

Guest Article: Is Playing Chess Good for You?

Posted on by

By

Renzo Verwer

Chess has been the subject to a torrent of publications. Chess is supposed to be popular among young people. Chess helps students do better at school. In particular, the Dutch psychologist Karel van Delft is an enthusiastic proponent of these ideas. Chess, he says, is capable of bestowing not a single benefit but several different ones. It brings people closer together. It promotes concentration, self confidence, and creativity. It is a kind of mental gymnastics and teaches players how to cope with difficult situations. By providing immediate and clearly visible feedback to one’s moves, it can even bring young offenders back to the straight and the narrow.

Speaking for myself, I love the game. More so, perhaps, than some grandmasters do; that is why I went to watch the recent Dutch championship tournament. However, the kind of worship mentioned in the previous paragraph always makes me a little uncomfortable. Is chess really what tea used to be in seventeenth-century Holland (and what cannabis supposedly is today), a cure for any- and everything? Some people, including the Dutch international master Hans Ree, are not so sure. The idea that chess can strengthen the will and develop logical thought, he says, is pure nonsense. To the contrary: authoritarian countries consciously and deliberately use the game in order to prevent people from thinking; this is done by canalizing them into an isolated culture that, separated as it is from ordinary life, has no further consequences for the latter. Chess as the opium of the people, perhaps? He also mentions the cruel joy he experienced as he saw his opponent squirming. Not the best or healthiest of emotions, he says.

This is something I know from my own experience. “What an idiot. He did not dare pursue his advantageous position but tried to husband his miserable pawns instead, with the result that he lost. What I felt was pure contempt. And if that causes you to despise me, that is your good right.

I asked Karel van de Weide, one-time Dutch grand master, to give me his considered view of the game. Here is what he told me:

Advantages? Chess is mental gymnastics. It helps you with your arithmetic and also to postpone the onset of dementia. Whoever is good as chess is someone. That is something I sometimes miss, for by now I am a nobody and will probably never recover my former status. As one of my colleagues, upon being dropped from the FIDE list, exclaimed: ‘I simply ceased to exist!’ (he may have been joking). Others argue that chess plays a useful role by providing some people who cannot easily fit into society with something they are good at. Agreed. And a certain kind of recognition too, of course.

And what are the disadvantages of chess? Chess may promote autism. It keeps you away from women [MvC: men play chess much better than women do, which is why, in tournaments, the sexes are separated] and is sufficiently demanding to keep you away from other, perhaps more useful, forms of training. It may make those who take it up as a career more accident prone, decreases their chances of making good, economically, and can even help turn them into social outcasts. As has been said about former Dutch champion Maarten Solleveld, had it not been for this obsession with chess he could have got his position as a professor of mathematics at Leiden much earlier than he did.
buy cialis pharmacy However, when it comes to drinking, “how much is too much” is a question with an elusive answer. If during sexual activity discomfort in the lower abdominal part, around generic tadalafil uk the bladder area, pubic region or perineal region. If you want to make guaranteed you get the sleep that you want, uncomplicated and uninterrupted, steer viagra sale clear of the following: cocaine, amphetamines, methamphetamines, no matter what kind of herbs, ephedrine, and taurine. After his playing days were finished, he appeared on his own show, Father Murphy and Little House on the Prairie. #12 Joe Namath – Broadway Joe Namath was the American Football League’s face and hero every where. #11 Lawrence Taylor – Among the best linebackers ever, Lawrence Taylor is another of the well-known football players that have gone on http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/1482311037_add_file_10.pdf canadian generic cialis to have a credible performing career.
Another prominent Dutch player and author, Tim Krabbé, told me about the less sympathetic aspects of chess, as experienced and observed by him. Especially in the kind of coffee house where the game is played:

Chess bears a strong resemblance to addiction, the kind you get by taking drugs—though I myself have never been addicted to them. Doing something you cannot resist even though you know that you should stop is very, very bad for your life. None of the prefaces to the books that teach the young how wonderful the game is and how to play it have a word to say about this danger. No, chess is always great, good for the brain and I do not know what else. Truth is, chess can be very dangerous and people should be made aware of that fact.

The psychologist Paul Kirchner criticizes the kind of research that “proves” that chess is good for all kinds of things. Nor is chess the only activity that has been advertised in this way. “Similar claims” he says, “have been made on behalf of other fields of study. Such as learning Latin, geometry, and, today, writing code; it all seems so simple and logical. Truth is, you can learn all kinds of procedures. But a procedure that will enable you to master all procedures does not exist.”

In other words: by learning how to play chess, the most important thing you learn is… how to play chess.

 

* Renzo Verwer (Woerden, the Netherlands, 1972) is an author and a dealer in second hand books. He has published books about love, work, and the chess master Bobby Fischer. His most recent one (in Dutch) is titled Freedom of Thought for Beginners. His website is www.artikelzeven.nu. His books: http://www.amazon.com/Renzo-Verwer/e/B00ITG41ES/chess.